2.+Standard+5b+Modeling+Best+Professional+Practices

=5 B.=

Professional education faculty have a thorough understanding of the content they teach. Teaching by professional education faculty helps candidates develop the proficiencies outlined in professional, state, and institutional standards and guides candidates in the application of research, theories, and current developments in their fields and in teaching. Professional education faculty value candidates’ learning and assess candidate performance. Their teaching encourages candidates’ development of reflection, critical thinking, problem solving, and professional dispositions. Professional education faculty use a variety of instructional strategies that reflect an understanding of different learning styles. They integrate diversity and technology throughout their teaching. They assess their own effectiveness as teachers, including the positive effects they have on candidates’ learning and performance.
 * ACCEPTABLE**

=Key Concepts= a)thorough understanding of the content: research, theories and current developments b) value and assess candidates' learning c) promote candidate reflection d) promote critical thinking e) promote problem solving f) promote professional dispositions g) faculty uses variety of instructional strategies that reflect an understanding of different learning styles. h) Faculty integrates diversity i) faculty integrates technology throughout teaching j) faculty assess their own effectiveness as teachers, including the positive effects they have on candidates' learning and performance

=Source of information=

faculty survey course syllabi SETE other evaluations faculty use effect on candidates' learning? field experience? PACT? RICA? CSU survey?

=Tables presented in last report= survey about instructional strategies

last report refers to conceptual framework

there are no tables for technology, we should add this to the survey

assessment of candidates methods table, data from survey

assessment of faculty: sete; aggregate sete scores for all candidates, summary table over 7 years (are we allowed to look at SETE'S?) who calculates this information?

recognition for excellence in teaching